Prêt à Construire un Meilleur Processus de Recrutement ?
Remplacez l'intuition par la science psychométrique validée. Demandez une démo et voyez votre première campagne live en 7 jours.
Remplacez l'intuition par la science psychométrique validée. Demandez une démo et voyez votre première campagne live en 7 jours.
Hi! I'm your AI Assistant
I can help you analyze interview sessions, understand candidate performance, and provide insights about your recruitment data.

Here's an uncomfortable truth about AI conversations: the longer they get, the dumber your AI becomes.
You've felt it. Turn 15 of a planning session, and suddenly your AI assistant is suggesting things you already rejected. Turn 30, and it's forgotten the core constraints of your project. By turn 50, you're basically starting over—except worse, because now there's a mountain of irrelevant context polluting every response.
Welcome to context rot, the silent killer of long-form AI collaboration. And if you're a solo founder trying to use AI as your virtual team, this isn't just annoying—it's a business liability.
Let's get technical for a moment. Modern LLMs boast massive context windows. frontier Pro models? 2 million tokens. GPT-4? 128K tokens. Claude 3? 200K tokens.
So why does performance still degrade?
Because more context isn't better context. It's like giving your CFO every email thread, Slack message, and random brainstorm note before asking them to review your quarterly financials. Sure, they could sift through it all. But why would you force them to?
The problem isn't capacity—it's signal-to-noise ratio. Every irrelevant detail in the context window is a distraction. Every tangent is a potential source of confusion. And as conversations grow, the ratio of noise to signal approaches 1:1.
Your AI starts hallucinating not because it's stupid, but because you've given it too much to think about.
Most AI chat interfaces work like this:
This works fine for quick questions. "What's the capital of France?" "Write me a product description." "Debug this code snippet."
But for the complex, multi-session work that solo founders actually need—strategic planning, product development, go-to-market strategy—this architecture is fundamentally broken.
By turn 50, your AI is trying to simultaneously remember:
No wonder it's confused. You would be too.
Here's the radical idea: what if each specialized task got its own AI, with its own carefully curated context?
Not a single monolithic assistant drowning in history. A team of specialized agents, each with exactly the information they need to excel at their specific role.
This is the architecture behind the AI Board Room at JobInterview.live, and it's how we maintain accuracy and coherence even at turn 50, 100, or beyond.
The AI Board Room uses several key technologies to implement context isolation:
Skills (Modular Expertise) Each agent—Atlas (strategy), Cipher (finance), Nova (operations), Sage (operations)—loads specialized knowledge via SKILL.md files. These are focused instruction sets that define expertise boundaries. Atlas doesn't need to know the intricacies of React component architecture. Cipher doesn't need your brand voice guidelines.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) When an agent needs external data or tools, MCP provides structured, just-in-time access. Instead of dumping your entire CRM into context, the agent queries for exactly the customer data relevant to the current task. The context stays lean. The information stays fresh.
A2A (Agent-to-Agent Protocol) Here's where it gets interesting. When Atlas (strategy) determines you need technical feasibility analysis, it doesn't dump its entire context into Cipher's lap. Instead, A2A enables structured delegation with minimal context transfer—just the specific question, relevant constraints, and expected output format.
Cipher receives a focused brief, does deep technical analysis with its specialized Skills, and returns a structured answer. No context pollution. No confusion about scope.
"But wait," you're thinking, "don't agents need to know about me and my business?"
Absolutely. That's where the User Dossier comes in.
Instead of every agent re-reading your entire conversation history, the system maintains a living document of key facts:
This dossier is curated, not cumulative. It's updated through Action Extraction—a process that identifies genuinely important decisions and facts from conversations, filtering out the noise.
When a new agent spins up, it gets:
That's it. No 50-turn conversation history. No tangential discussions. Just signal.
Here's what this architecture enables in practice:
Session 1, Turn 5: You're brainstorming a new SaaS product with Atlas. Lots of "what ifs" and exploratory questions.
Session 3, Turn 47: You're working with Cipher on database architecture. Cipher knows your tech stack (from the Dossier) and the product requirements (from structured A2A delegation), but it's not confused by that early brainstorm where you considered a completely different business model.
Session 7, Turn 103: Nova is helping you craft marketing copy. It has your brand voice guidelines and target market profile, but it's not trying to remember every technical decision Cipher made or every strategic pivot Atlas helped you through.
Each agent maintains focused expertise without degradation.
The Critic Agent—our quality control layer built on the Deterministic Backbone (Google ADK)—ensures consistency across agents without requiring them to share context. It validates outputs against your Dossier and project requirements, catching contradictions before they reach you.
One more thing: this architecture becomes even more powerful with Native Audio in voice mode.
Traditional voice AI systems transcribe speech to text, process it, then synthesize a response. Each step adds latency and loses nuance.
Native audio processing means agents can pick up on tone, urgency, and emotional context without that information being explicitly stated. And because of context isolation, they can do this without the audio data bloating the context window of every subsequent interaction.
You can have a stressed, rapid-fire voice session with Sage about an operational crisis, and the next day have a calm, exploratory conversation with Atlas about long-term strategy—without the emotional residue of the first conversation polluting the second.
If you're building a business alone or with a tiny team, you can't afford AI tools that degrade over time. You need systems that get better as they learn about you and your business, not worse.
Context isolation transforms AI from a disposable chat interface into a persistent virtual team. Each board member maintains their expertise. Knowledge accumulates in structured ways (the Dossier, Action Extraction) rather than chaotic ways (endless conversation history).
You get the continuity of a real team without the context rot of traditional AI assistants.
This is what separates toys from tools. What separates experiments from infrastructure.
We're still early in the agent era. Most AI products are still stuck in the chat paradigm, throwing more tokens at the context window problem instead of rethinking the architecture.
But the future is clear: specialized, context-isolated agents working in concert. Not monolithic assistants drowning in history. Not stateless chatbots that forget everything between sessions.
A true virtual board room, where each member has expertise, memory, and focus.
Ready to experience AI that doesn't degrade over time?
The AI Board Room at JobInterview.live is live and ready to be your virtual team. Atlas, Cipher, Nova, and Sage are waiting—each with specialized Skills, isolated context, and the ability to maintain accuracy through turn 50, 100, and beyond.
Stop fighting context rot. Start building with agents that actually remember what matters and forget what doesn't.
Your board room awaits.